Help on Tele2, tariffs, questions

• Download essay "" in ZIP archive
• Download essay " Chatsky and the Famus Society." in MS WORD format
• Essay Version" Chatsky and the Famus Society." for print

Russian writers

1) Chatsky 2) Famus societyATTITUDE TO WEALTH, RANKS, CAREER:1) "Ranks are given by people, but people can strip themselves."At first, mockingly, and then angrily, he protests against the equals ruling in society, who demand slavish obedience, hypocrisy and opportunism.2) Famusov: "With me, servants of strangers are very rare; More and more sisters, sister-in-laws, children ... Be poor, but if there are two thousand family members, Tom and the groom."Molchalin: "After all, it is necessary to depend on others. ... We are small in ranks"ATTITUDE TO THE SERVICE:1) "I would be glad to serve, it's sickening to serve ...""When in business, I hide from fun,When I fool around, I fool aroundAnd to mix these two craftsThere are a lot of artisans, I'm not one of them"2) Famusov: "... My custom is this: Signed, so off your shoulders." Molchalin: "Well, really, what would you like to serve us in Moscow?And take awards and have fun?ATTITUDE TO serfdom:1) Famusov about Chatsky (with horror)"A dangerous man! He wants to preach liberty! Yes, he does not recognize the authorities!"He calls the feudal landlords "noble scoundrels", some of whom "drew on many wagons from mothers and fathers of rejected children to the serf ballet", which were then all "sold out one by one". He dreams of ridding the Russian people of slavery.2) Khlestakov: "Out of boredom, I took with me an Arapka-girl and a dog, - Tell them to feed them, already, my friend .... A handout came from dinner" In this society, a man and a dog have the same value: the landowner changes serfs, who "more than once they saved his life and honor," on three greyhounds.ATTITUDE TO EDUCATION:1) Well educated.famusov about Chatsky"... he is small with a head, and writes gloriously, translate" 2) Khlestakov: "And indeed you will go crazy from these, from some of boarding schools, schools, lyceums ..." Skalozub: "... You won't fool me with learning. .."Famusov:"...Learning is the plague, learning is the reason, What is more now than ever, Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions"HOW HEROES UNDERSTAND THE MIND:1) "There are important people who were reputed to be fools ...... but called by all the world,Especially in recent yearsThat they have become smart, at least where ... "(It is assumed that these lines are dedicated to Alexander 1)The mind in the understanding of Chatsky is enlightenment, advanced views, the desire to seek benefits not for oneself, but for the Fatherland. For Famusov, this is the mind of a rebel, "carbonaria." That is why, in his perception, Chatsky's mind is madness (in their world they are doomed to persecution every independent thought, every sincere feeling). 2) Sophia (about Chatsky) "Will such a mind make a family happy..."the mind in the Famus society is the ability to make a career, achieve a rank, live richly, marry profitably - "reach the known degrees." This is a practical, worldly, dodgy mind.

Comedy A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" is a satire on the society of the Moscow nobles of the early 19th century. It presents the split in the nobility that had emerged by that time, the essence of which lies in the historically logical contradiction between the old and new views on many social issues. In the play, Chatsky and Famusov's society collide - the "current century" and the "past century".

The Moscow aristocratic society is represented by Famusov, the manager in the government house, his secretary Molchalin, Colonel Skalozub, secondary and off-stage characters. This fairly large camp of conservative nobles is opposed by one main character of the comedy - Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky.

The conflict between Chatsky and Famusovsky society arises when the protagonist of the play returns to Moscow, where he has been absent for three years. Once Chatsky was brought up with Sophia, the seventeen-year-old daughter of Famusov. Between them there was a youthful love, which still burns in the heart of Chatsky. Then he went abroad to "seek the mind."

His beloved now has tender feelings for Molchalin, who lives in their house. But Chatsky does not know about it. The love conflict develops into a social one, forcing Chatsky to speak out against the Famus society on the most pressing issues. Their disputes relate to education, family relations, serfdom, public service, bribery, servility.

Returning to Moscow, Chatsky discovers that nothing has changed here, no social problems have been resolved, and the nobles continue to spend their time in fun and idleness: “What new will Moscow show me? Yesterday there was a ball, and tomorrow there will be two. Chatsky's attacks on Moscow, on the way of life of the landlords, makes Famusov afraid of him. The conservative nobility is not ready to change their views on life, their habits, they are not ready to part with their comfort. Therefore, Chatsky for the Famus society is a “dangerous person”, because “he wants to preach freedom.” Famusov even calls him a "carbonari" - a revolutionary - and believes that it is dangerous to let people like Chatsky even come close to the capital.

What ideas does Famusov and his supporters defend? Most of all, in the society of the old Moscow nobles, the opinion of the world is valued. For the sake of gaining a good reputation, they are ready for any sacrifice. It does not matter whether the person corresponds to the impression that he makes. Famusov believes that the best example for his daughter is the example of her father. In society, he is "known for his monastic behavior."

But when no one is watching him, there is no trace of Famusov's morality. Before scolding his daughter for being alone in the room with Molchalin, he flirts with his maid Lisa, makes her unambiguous hints. It becomes clear to the reader that Famusov, who reads his daughter's morality, lives according to immoral principles, the main of which is "sin is not a problem, rumor is not good."

Such is the attitude of the Famus society to the service. Here, too, external attributes predominate over internal content. Chatsky calls the Moscow nobility passionate for ranks and believes that the uniform covers "their weakness, poverty of reason."

When Chatsky turns to Famusov with a question about how Sophia's father would respond to his possible matchmaking with his daughter, Famusov angrily replies: "Come and serve." Chatsky "would be glad to serve", but he refuses to "serve". For the main character of a comedy, this is unacceptable. Chatsky considers this a humiliation. He seeks to serve "the cause, not the persons."

But Famusov sincerely admires the ability to "serve". Here the reader, from the words of Famusov, learns about Maxim Petrovich, who “knew honor before everyone”, had “a hundred people at his service” and “ate on gold”. At one of the receptions at the Empress, Maxim Petrovich stumbled and fell. But, seeing the smile on Catherine's face, he decided to turn this incident to his advantage, so he fell a few more times specifically to amuse the yard. Famusov asks Chatsky: “... What do you think? We think it's smart." But the honor and dignity of Chatsky cannot allow him to "fit into the regiment of jesters." He is not going to earn his position in society through servility and sycophancy.

If Famusov is outraged by Chatsky’s unwillingness to serve, then the careerism of Colonel Skalozub, who has “an enviable rank beyond his years,” causes obsequious awe in this hero. Skalozub, according to Sophia, is so stupid that "the words of a smart man will not pronounce forever." But it is him that Famusov wants to see as his son-in-law. After all, all Moscow nobles want to acquire relatives "with stars and ranks." Chatsky can only lament that this society is persecuting "people with a soul", that the personal qualities of a person do not matter here, and only money and ranks are valued.

Even Molchalin, who is laconic throughout the play, in a dialogue with Chatsky boasts of his successes in the service: “As far as I work and strength, since I have been listed in the archives, I have received three awards.” He, despite his young age, was used, like the old Moscow nobles, to make acquaintances based on personal gain, because “one must depend on others” until one himself has a high rank. Therefore, the life credo of this character is: "In my years, one should not dare to have one's own judgment." It turns out that the silence of this hero is just a mask covering his meanness and duplicity.
Chatsky's attitude to the Famus society and to the principles by which this society exists is sharply negative. In it, only those “whose neck bent more often” reach heights. Chatsky values ​​his freedom.

The noble society, depicted in the comedy Woe from Wit, is afraid of change, of everything new, which, under the influence of historical events, penetrates the consciousness of a Russian nobleman. He manages to defeat Chatsky only due to the fact that in this comedy he is completely alone. This is the originality of Chatsky's conflict with the Famus society. However, the aristocrats are genuinely horrified by the words of Chatsky, because he fearlessly denounces their vices, points out the need for change, and therefore threatens their comfort and well-being.

Light found a way out of this situation. At the ball, Sophia, in a conversation with one of the guests, throws the phrase that Chatsky is "out of his mind." Sophia cannot be attributed to the representatives of the "past century", but former lover Chatsky threatens her personal happiness. This gossip instantly spreads among Famusov's guests, because only the crazy Chatsky does not pose a danger to them.
By the end of the day, in which the action of the comedy "Woe from Wit" unfolds, all Chatsky's hopes are dispelled. He "sobered up ... completely." Only after experiencing all the cruelty of the Famus society, he understands that his paths parted ways with him completely. He has no place among people who live their lives "in feasts and in extravagance."

Thus, Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit" is forced to retreat in the face of the Famus society only because he has no chance of winning alone. But time will put everything in its place, and Chatsky's supporters will bring the spirit of freedom and the value of a person's personal qualities to the environment of the nobles.

The described peculiarity of Chatsky’s conflict with the Famus society will help 9th grade students to recreate the confrontation between the two worlds in their essay on the topic “Chatsky and Famus Society”

Artwork test

The famous moral and social play in verse "Woe from Wit" by A.S. Griboyedov became an original highly artistic and socially significant work of the first quarter of the 19th century. The author worked on the main work of his life for several years and depicted in it the images and real types of people of that era.

Conflict

In the work “Woe from Wit”, the plot is based on two conflicts: the first is a love conflict, in which the main character Chatsky and Sofya participate, the second is a socio-ideological one, where again Chatsky, the owner himself (Famusov) and his guests, defending outdated conservative views.

Getting down to the topic “Famusov’s attitude to serfdom”, first let’s figure out what kind of person he is, what is his priority. Chatsky will become the main exposer of such pillars of the noble society as Famusov, convinced serfs who are ready to send their serf servants to Siberia for any oversight.

The image of Famusov

Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov is the central figure of the play. Turning to the topic “Famusov’s attitude to serfdom”, it should be noted that he is a prominent representative of conservatives who adhere to the philosophical teachings of their ancestors. He calls them "fathers", in turn, these are people who hold high government posts and are wealthy landowners. They always advocate the preservation of autocracy and serfdom. They were never interested in questions of education and freedom. The image of Famusov is a collective image, which represents the ruling class that has power over others.

government man

Famusov himself is also not a poor person and has a fairly high rank of "manager in a government place." The success and promotion of many people largely depends on it. He distributes awards and ranks, draws up patronage for young officials and pensions for retirees. It is quite understandable that people like Famusov will fight to the last to maintain their status and privileges. This hero praises Moscow traditions and customs. He believes that in everything you need to rely on the experience of the "fathers" and learn from the older generation.

Famusov's quotes contain the meaning of "what is honor according to father and son", let him be poor, but if he has a couple of thousand serfs, then he will be considered worthy as a groom.

Excess mind is a vice

Famusov, in his life convictions, calls progressive young free-thinking a vice. He believes that this comes from an excess of intelligence and learning. He has a mundane and worldly idea about the mind. According to his reasoning, a smart one is one who was able to get a good job and make a career for himself at the expense of patrons. For him, scholarship is the same as free-thinking, in which he sees a huge danger to the whole society and state. Famusov's quotes for this occasion are simply amazing: "if evil is to be stopped, all the books would be taken away and burned."

Service attitude

The main theme is service, here everyone dreams of rank and wealth. Famusov treats people like Colonel Skalozub with deep respect. Chatsky, who abandoned the service, considers the person “lost”, “although if he wanted to, he would be businesslike,” Famusov remarks about him. However, the landowner himself treats his duties very dismissively "signed, so off his shoulders."

Famusov's attitude to serfdom

Famusov is a Russian landowner of the 19th century, for whom the possession of serfs seems to be the most natural thing. Chatsky, on the contrary, speaks sharply about serfdom and denounces its supporters in every possible way. He never accepts the fact that serfs can be exchanged for thoroughbred puppies Chatsky opposes the oppression of the people, he is for freedom and equality between people. The landowners live and feast at the expense of their slaves, therefore "they themselves are fat, and their lackeys are skinny."

If we expand further on the topic “Attitude towards serfdom of Famusov”, then the image of Famusov is a tough reactionary-minded bureaucracy, which was the stronghold of the tsarist autocracy. Exposing the reactionary nature of the Famus society, Griboedov wanted to show where the domination of these people leads, how they influence the life of the simple Russian people.

Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is a priceless masterpiece in Russian literature. This work describes the society of the nobility of the XIX century. The main character of this comedy is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - an intelligent, free-thinking young man. The author in the work contrasts it with the Famus society, thereby showing us the contradictions between the “Current Age” and the “past century”.
The most prominent representative of the Famus society is Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. This is a person who does not like the service and works only for the sake of awards. The Famus society included people who lived according to established customs. The main task in their life was to acquire a high rank and a high position in society, in order to "take awards and live happily." These people are ardent feudal lords, capable of killing and robbing people, controlling their fate. Chatsky furiously unleashes his anger on these people. He does not accept their beliefs and does not believe in the laws of old Moscow. Chatsky responds to Famusov's story about the late uncle Maxim Petrovich with a remark characterizing Catherine's age as "an age of humility and fear." Chatsky advocates the abolition of serfdom. He is very outraged that the peasants are not considered people, that they can be exchanged for some things or sold. He talks indignantly about how one landowner sold a serf ballet for debts, and another changed his best servants for greyhounds. I still strongly resent the imitation of the nobles in the West. Chatsky noticed that the doors of noble houses are always open to foreign guests. So, a Frenchman from Bordeaux, who was going to the country of the barbarians, met the warmest welcome in Russia and did not find here "neither the sound of a Russian, nor a Russian face." But Chatsky could not change the people around him, because he was opposed not by individuals, but by the whole noble life.
In his work, Griboyedov managed to create the image of a hero who fights for the rights of people. Although the author describes only Moscow and Famusov's house, a picture of the whole of Russia in the first half of the 19th century appears before readers. And I am very sorry that at that time there were few people like Chatsky.

There are many different people in the world: some, like Chatsky, are educated and interesting, others, like the Famus society, are vile, envious, thinking only about wealth and nobility. Such people were compared in his comedy “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboyedov. The whole conflict takes place in the house of the nobleman Famusov.
Famusov is one of the main characters of the work. He is a wealthy uneducated man. Famusov does not care at all about the future of his country, his people. He hates books: "take away all the books and burn them." Famusov created a society around him in which people spread gossip against each other, doing it behind their backs. Famusov says about Chatsky: "A dangerous person", "He wants to preach freedom." Sophia about Chatsky: “I’m ready to pour out bile on everyone.” Chatsky about Molchalin: “Why not a husband? There is only little intelligence in him.” Platon Mikhailovich about Zagoretsky: "A notorious swindler, a rogue." Khlestova considers Zagoretsky "a liar, a gambler and a thief." The Famus society scolds everything new and advanced, but no one looks at himself from the outside, "not noticing about himself." All these people live in the world only for intrigues that look like madness. Chatsky, the main character of the comedy, opposes their views. He is a preacher of new life, a defender of advanced ideas. Alexander Andreevich is a smart, sincere, noble person. He is also very courageous and determined. Confirmation of this is Chatsky's monologue “And who are the judges? ..”. Remember how he criticized high society with its old views on life, talked about the injustice that reigns between the rich and the poor, how he wanted to serve the Fatherland, but “it’s sickening to serve”? Witty, eloquent, Chatsky maliciously ridicules the vile vices of Famus society: kowtowing to superiors, servility and servility. His mind, rich and figurative language find abundant material for this:
Judgments draw from forgotten newspapers
The times of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea ...
Chatsky despises braggarts who receive their "lyre" not by serving the Motherland, but by flattering some individual person. Griboyedov wanted to show how
it is difficult for a person whose thoughts and behavior differ from the opinion of the majority.
It is likely that there will be a Famus society all the time, because there will always be people who will be commanded by the upper classes. The comedy "Woe from Wit" made a huge contribution to the development of Russian literature and became an immortal treasure of people. It can be said that Russian drama was born along with this work.

Very often in life we ​​come across people who can be compared with the Famus society. They are vile, stupid and mediocre. What is the mind for them? And what does it really mean? These issues are resolved in the great work of Russian literature by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit".
This grief was the main character of the comedy, Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - an intelligent, noble, honest and courageous person. He hates and despises the Famus society, in which the main theme in life is servitude. He can be compared to a lone hero who fights an entire regiment. But his superiority was that he was unusually intelligent. Chatsky wanted to honestly serve his homeland, but he did not want to serve higher ranks: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.” These words of his testify that we have before us a proud, witty and eloquent person. In this work, A.S. Griboyedov shows the conflict between two opposite sides - Chatsky and Famusovsky society. Alexander Andreevich is a victim of his wit.
The people with whom he was surrounded did not understand him and did not even strive for this. They are accustomed to live in eternal "slavery", the concept of freedom is alien to them. It seems to me that Chatsky is not the only positive character in this comedy, there are such characters that Griboyedov only mentions in his work. This is Skalozub's cousin, who left the service and went to the village, the nephew of Princess Tugoukhovskaya, Prince Fedor, a chemist and botanist. They can be considered allies of Chatsky. The main character is simply unbearable to be in the company of people like Famusov, Skalozub, Molchalin. They considered themselves very intelligent, earning their position by sycophancy. So Famusov confirms this in his own words: “Even though he’s honest, though he’s not, it’s even for us, dinner is ready for everyone.” And also, talking about his late uncle, who knew when to serve, he was proud that it was his relative who was so “smart”. People from the Famus society did not notice how stupid their morals were. These people lived an imaginary life, without thinking about the main thing - about its meaning. Chatsky loved Sophia very much and confessed this to her at their first meeting after a long separation, and she answered him: “Why do you need me?”. The protagonist begins to think that she has become the same as her father and his entourage. Chatsky leaves Moscow, realizing that he has no place there. But the Famus society cannot be considered the winner, since Chatsky did not lose this battle, he did not become like these people, did not sink to their level. It seems to me that this person was born a little earlier than the time in which it would be easier for him to live. I believe that the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" is a great work of Russian literature, which is immortal.

I read a great comedy by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit". It was created by the author for eight years. “Woe from Wit” is a comedy about how a crowd of fools does not understand one sane person. The events of the comedy develop in one Moscow aristocratic house within one day. The main characters of this work are Chatsky, Famusov, his daughter Sophia and Famusova's secretary Molchalin.
In comedy, there is a Famus society that opposes Chatsky. It lives with the opposite worldview, honoring and defending servility and hypocrisy. Chatsky himself appears in the Famus world, like a cleansing thunderstorm. He is in everything opposite to the typical representatives of the Famus society. If Molchalin, Famusov, Skalozub see the meaning of life in their well-being, then Chatsky dreams of selfless service to the fatherland, of benefiting the people whom he respects and considers “smart and vigorous”. So, in a conversation with Famusov Skalozub utters the following phrase:
..Yes, in order to get ranks, there are many channels.
These people are deeply indifferent to the fate of their homeland and people. Their cultural and moral level can be judged by such remarks by Famusov: “Take away all the books and burn them,” because “scholarship is the reason” that “crazy divorced people and deeds and opinions.” Chatsky has a different opinion - a man of extraordinary intelligence, courageous, honest, sincere. He appreciates people who are ready "to put a mind hungry for knowledge into science." This is the only character that reflects many important traits of the author's personality. Chatsky is a person to whom the author trusts his thoughts and views. The hero Griboyedov has a lot of strength, he is eager for action and is ready to prove his point of view. So, in a conversation with Famusov, Chatsky says:
Chatsky is a representative of that part of the noble youth that rebels against the society of the Famusovs, the pufferfish, the silent ones. There are still a few such people, they are not yet capable of fighting the existing system, but they appear. That is why Chatsky can rightly be called a hero of his time. It was they who were to carry out the first stage of the revolutionary liberation movement, stir up the country, bring nearer the time when the people would be freed from the chains of slavery.

If someone asked me why I liked the comedy “Woe from Wit”, I would answer like this: “An interesting plot, bright characters, unique thoughts and statements emotionally affected me.” This work is one of those that, once read, you leave in your memory for a long time. The comedy "Woe from Wit" cannot be imagined without the author himself. Griboyedov and "Woe from Wit" - this is something without which neither one nor the other could exist alone.
The very name of the comedy “Woe from Wit” suggests that the main character was not understood by the people around him. This hero, to whom the author pays more attention, is Chatsky. He is an intelligent, smart, honest, kind, sincere, courageous, disinterested, cheerful, progressive person. He is not afraid to express his point of view. He soberly assesses the situation and the position of the Famus society, not being afraid to express his opinion. Boldly entering into a conversation, he expresses his thoughts to the faces of his interlocutors. For example, the quote “Houses are new, but prejudices are old” speaks of the modern view of this person on life in Russia. The subtle and penetrating mind of Chatsky does not accept the Famus society, which he criticizes. The main character is disgusted to humiliate himself in front of people who are higher in the service and, perhaps, undeservedly occupy military posts, for example, Colonel Skalozub.
Comparing Chatsky with the colonel, we can say that he is higher in mental development, thinking, courage, which Skalozub does not have. I think that Skalozub, who holds such a position in the state, is not worthy to manage and command the regiments that were under his command. He could not cope with his duty to the Fatherland, because he does not have such virtues as Chatsky.
The face completely opposite to Chatsky is Molchalin. I have a special opinion about him. Even his last name speaks of meanness, flattery. He always takes advantage of the situation. Molchalin is able to betray, deceive, frame, but at what cost?! Only to get a new position! Chatsky exposes the character of Molchalin and expresses his opinion: “But by the way, he will reach the known levels, because now they love the dumb.”
Speaking about the main representative of the Famusov society, Famusov himself, we can say that this person has a very high opinion of himself: “He is known for his monastic behavior.” In fact, he is an egoist, there is nothing interesting in him as a person. Even contrasting Chatsky with Famusov is impossible. Chatsky is much higher and much more worthy of him.
Chatsky is the winner, despite the fact that he was mistaken for a madman. He was forced to leave Moscow: “Get out of Moscow! I don't come here anymore." As a result, he was never able to achieve the recognition of Famusov and the reciprocal love of Sofia.
Chatsky is a spokesman for new ideas, and therefore society could not understand him correctly and accept him as he is. His image in literature will live on until the mind of mankind understands what ideas need to be fought for and defended.

I read a wonderful comedy by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit". This comedy makes fun of a stupid, dumb and mean society. It was written in 1824. In the comedy, the author depicts a true picture of the life of the Moscow nobility, which needed to be updated. I would like to start my essay with a quote characterizing the lifestyle of these nobles:
In the love of traitors, in the enmity of the tireless,
Indomitable storytellers,
Clumsy wise men, crafty simpletons,
Sinister old women, old men,
decrepit over fiction, nonsense ...
Griboedov describes the Moscow nobility, consisting of the Famusovs, Zagoretsky, and pufferfish. They don't belong to the high society. These are people who have never served at court. These are various talkers and swindlers like Zagoretsky, who are ready to humiliate themselves in front of the rich in order to get into their favor. This is a famous society. Wealth and nobility are the main requirements in it. The representative of this society is Famusov, who already has an adult daughter. Famusov's ideal is his uncle:
He fell hurt, got up healthy.
And he says this about his attitude:
... Signed, so off your shoulders.
Molchalin does not dare to object to his boss. He is quiet, timid, deceitful. Molchalin does not love Sophia, who does not know this. He cares because she likes it. Molchalin has no opinion. He pleases those on whom he depends.
Skalozub - Famusov's friend:
And the golden bag, and marks the generals.
He seeks awards, waits for the moment when someone will retire or be killed in the war.
In the third act, we get to know other friends of Famusov. This is Zagoretsky - a liar and a saint, Khlestova - an ignorant and grouchy old woman, the all-knowing Repetilov, Prince Tugoukhovsky, who is looking for rich and famous husbands for his daughters. The circle of concerns of these people is lunches, dinners, the search for connections that help advance in the service. For them, a promotion can be obtained without special merit:
..Yes, in order to get ranks, there are many channels ...
For the sake of awards, they are ready to humiliate themselves, to be jesters. Relations in the world of the Famusovs are based on fear and submission to superiors. It doesn't matter to them whether he is smart or stupid:
Honor for father and son.
The subject of conversation is gossip. The main task for parents is, as it were, to marry or marry their children in a more successful way. And in this insignificant society appears the noble, honest, educated, courageous and witty Chatsky. Chatsky is the only positive character in this comedy. Once he lived in Famusov's house, was friends with Sofia. Gradually, his friendship grew into love, but then he left to wander. Here, three years later, he returns, full of hope. But Sofia no longer loves Chatsky and gives him a cold welcome. She became completely different. She is cold, arrogant. Chatsky, trying to find out who Sofia's chosen one, comes into conflict with the entire Famus society. This society is afraid of Chatsky, because he brings with him new views on life, new orders. But the Moscow nobility does not want to change anything and declares Chatsky crazy. Famusov is also afraid of Chatsky, because the main character is smart, sharp. He is distinguished by independence of judgment and courage of statements. He accuses the Famus society of lies, slander, helpfulness, pretense, hypocrisy, stupidity, ignorance, for which the society rejects him. At the end, Chatsky leaves. But who is he - the defeated or the winner? Chatsky is a winner because he is not alone! Somewhere there are similar to it, which every day becomes more.
I really liked Griboedov's comedy, because the author, acting as Chatsky, is not afraid to accuse the Moscow nobility of lies and slander. It would be desirable that in our society there was no "woe from the mind."

Who is Chatsky and what is this Famus society? The author compares and contrasts two categories of people who even in our time meet and conflict with each other.
Griboyedov's comedy, like the globe, has two poles. On one of them is Chatsky - an intelligent, courageous, determined person. The author appreciates the mind in people and wants to show his main character as a man of higher moral principles. Arriving in Moscow after a long absence, Alexander Andreevich is disappointed. He hopes to meet Sofia, whom he has loved since childhood. But, having come to her house, he realizes that he is not welcome here. It is in this house that Chatsky encounters the Famus society: Famusov himself, Skalozub, Molchalin and others, just as stupid, mediocre and worthless people. Their main goal was to “deserve” a high rank and have a place in high society. I'm not saying that Chatsky did not belong to high society, but he did not sink to the level of Famusov and his ilk. Alexander Andreevich remained a man of honor, he did not drop his own dignity. Chatsky is trying to understand why he is worse than Molchalin, because he is a deceitful and vile person. Why did Sofia prefer Molchalin, and not him? How did this mean man earn her attention? The main character is afraid to even think that Sophia has become the same as her father. The entire Famus society is trying to destroy a person who is smarter than them. They spread gossip about Chatsky's madness. By this act, the entire Famus society showed its stupidity. No one has refuted this claim. Chatsky understands very well that he does not belong in Moscow, and leaves. But this does not indicate that the Famus society managed to break his pride and honor. On the contrary, Chatsky still remained above Famusov and his entourage.
It seems to me that Chatsky is the most striking example for readers, that is, you and me. Reading a comedy, we absorb what the author wanted to teach, namely: honor, intelligence and human dignity.

In the comedy "Woe from Wit" all the characters are divided into positive - Chatsky - and negative - Famus and Famus society. Griboyedov called Chatsky an advanced person, that is, a person whose image will live forever, and Famus society - the face of all the nobles of that century (“the century of the past”). In the comedy, the Famus society opposes Chatsky. Indeed, in this society, enlightenment and science arouse special hatred. Griboyedov not only ridicules this society, but mercilessly condemns it. Famusov, as the main representative of this society, is an undeveloped person. Therefore, ignorance reigns in his house. Chatsky is the absolute opposite of Famusov. He is a thinking and feeling person. His actions speak for themselves. Chatsky, it seems to me, is very trusting of people. When he returns to Moscow, he, without going home, runs to his beloved. But he was late. Sofia, Famusov's daughter, has changed, she does not have that former love - that's how Famusov's upbringing worked. By this, Griboyedov shows Famusov's selfishness. But as soon as Chatsky arrives, Famusov cordially accepts him as a person of his circle. He says:
Well, you threw out a thing!
Three years did not write two words!
And suddenly it burst like from the clouds.
Famusov, as it were, wants to show his friendship, which has remained. However, it is not. Chatsky immediately runs to Sofia, but she is no longer the same. Despite this, Chatsky still loves her and immediately speaks of her beauty. But in the end he learns everything about her. For Griboedov, knowledge is above everything, and ignorance is below everything. And Griboedov knowingly shows the role of Chatsky and compares his mind with the ignorance of the Famus society. There is a lot of negativity in Famusov, and his ignorance is confirmed by the words in a conversation with Lisa about reading Sophia:
Tell me that it's not good for her eyes to spoil,
And in reading, the use is not great ...
The Famus society calls Chatsky bad and says that he has lost his mind. But what struck Chatsky? This is what exactly Sophia started gossip about Chatsky's madness, and the whole society picked up:
And really you will go crazy from these, from some
From boarding schools, schools, lyceums...
And Chatsky needs to leave Famusov's house. He is defeated, since the Famus society turned out to be stronger than Chatsky. But in turn, he gave a good rebuff to the "past century."
The significance of the comedy "Woe from Wit" lies in the fact that the comedy vividly reflected the time when the struggle between the Decembrists and the oppressor landowners was growing.

“Woe from Wit” is a realistic comedy. Griboedov gave in it a true picture of Russian life. The comedy posed topical social problems of those times: about education, contempt for everything national, worship of foreign, education, service, ignorance of society.
The main character of the comedy is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. Witty, eloquent, he maliciously ridicules the vices of the society that surrounds him. He differs sharply from those around him in his mind, abilities, independence of judgment. The image of Chatsky is something new, bringing change. This hero is a spokesman for the advanced ideas of his time. Famus society is traditional. His life positions are such that “you need to learn by looking at your elders”, destroy free-thinking thoughts, serve with humility to those who are one step higher, be sure to be rich. Famusov's only passion is a passion for rank and money.
The beliefs of Chatsky and Famusovsky society are different. Chatsky condemns serfdom, imitation of foreign, people's lack of desire for education and their own opinion. The dialogues between Chatsky and Famusov are a struggle. At the beginning of the comedy, it manifests itself not so sharply. Famusov is even ready to give in to Sophia, but at the same time he sets conditions:
I would say, firstly: do not be blissful,
Name, brother, do not manage by mistake,
And, most importantly, go and serve.
To which Chatsky replies:
I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve.
But gradually the struggle turns into a battle. Chatsky argues with Famusov about the way and way of life. But the main character is alone in the fight against the views of Moscow society, in which he has no place.
Molchalin and Skalozub are not the last representatives of the Famus society. They are rivals and opponents of Chatsky. Molchalin is helpful, silent. He wants to please with his humility, accuracy, flattery. Puffer shows himself to be someone very important, businesslike, significant. But under his uniform, he hides "weakness, poverty of reason." His thoughts are connected only with getting a higher rank, money, power:
Yes, in order to get ranks, there are many channels;
About them as a true philosopher I judge:
I just want to be a general.
Chatsky does not tolerate lies and falsehood. This man's tongue is as sharp as a knife. Each of his characteristics is labeled and caustic:
Molchalin used to be so stupid!..
Wretched creature!
Has he really grown wiser? .. And that one -
hoarse, strangled, bassoon,
A constellation of maneuvers and mazurkas!
Chatsky's monologue “And who are the judges? ..” mercilessly condemns the Famus society. Each new face that appears in the course of the development of the plot takes the side of Famusov. Gossip grows like a "snowball". And Chatsky can't stand it. He can no longer remain in the society of low, vile, conceited and stupid people. They condemned him for his mind, for freedom of speech and thought, for honesty.
Before leaving, Chatsky throws to the whole Famus society:
You are right: he will come out of the fire unharmed,
Who will have time to spend the day with you,
Breathe the air alone
And his mind will survive.
Chatsky is above them, the best and rare qualities are manifested in him. Those who cannot see and appreciate this, at the very least, are simply fools. Chatsky is immortal, and now this hero is relevant.
The comedy "Woe from Wit" made a huge contribution to the development of Russian literature. Griboyedov's play was, is and will be a modern work until servitude, greed, gossip disappear from our lives.

The comedy was written on the eve of the Decembrist uprising in 1825. In the comedy Woe from Wit, Griboyedov gave a true picture of Russian life after the Patriotic War of 1812. In a small work, Griboyedov depicted only one day in Famusov's house.
In comedy, we meet people who are equal in origin. These are nobles, but everyone has their own views on life. Their opinions contradict each other. A certain conflict arises between them, which is hidden from prying eyes. But in the comedy “Woe from Wit”, this conflict is clearly visible and not hidden - the clash of the “Current Century”, of which Chatsky was a representative, with the “past century”, which is represented by Famusov and his entourage.
One of the most striking figures of comedy is Famusov. Famusov is an influential person who occupies a significant place. In addition, he is a wealthy landowner. An important state position and a large estate create a strong position for Famusov among the Moscow nobility. He does not bother himself with work, he spends his time in idleness:
... Magnificent build chambers,
Where they overflow in feasts and prodigality...
He looks at public service as a way to achieve wealth and rank. He uses his official position for personal gain. Famusov looks at enlightenment, new progressive views as a source of “debauchery”. The doctrine considers evil:
Learning is the plague, learning is the cause
What is now more than ever,
Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions.
However, he gives his daughter a good upbringing.
Hospitality for Famusov is a means of maintaining ties with useful people.
Famusov is one of the most prominent representatives of the Moscow nobility. Other people are also represented: Colonel Skalozub, princes Tugoukhovsky, Countess Khryumina.
Griboedov satirically draws the Famus society. The characters are funny and disgusting, but not because the author made them so, but because they are such in reality itself.
Skalozub is a man of age and money. Service for him is not the defense of the fatherland, but the achievement of nobility and money.
Famusov's world consists not only of feudal lords, but also of their servants. Molchalin is an official dependent on the Famus society. Molchalin was taught to please influential people. He received three awards for his diligence. Molchalin is terrible because he can take on any form: both a patriot and a lover. Despite individual differences, all members of the Famus society are a single social group.
Chatsky appears in this society, a man of advanced ideas, fiery feelings and high morality. He belongs to a noble society, but in his way of thinking he does not find like-minded people. In this society, Chatsky feels lonely. His views are rebuffed by others. The sharpest denunciations of Chatsky are directed against serfdom. It is serfdom that makes it possible for the people of the Famus society to live by robbery.
Chatsky left the civil service, as they demanded cringing from him:
I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve.
He stands for true enlightenment, art, science. Chatsky is against the upbringing that is given to children in noble families. He fought for freedom of thought, freedom of action. It seems to me that this is the main difference between Chatsky and the Famus society, which did not recognize such mores.
I think that such a great work will delight and surprise more than one generation.